Fractional Kellythe optimal size, and why nobody trades it
Kelly's 1956 result gives the position size that maximises the long-run growth rate of an account, given the odds. It is a real theorem and the answer is exact.
It is also, applied literally, close to unusable — because the formula assumes you know your edge, and you do not. Overestimate the edge and Kelly does not merely underperform; it destroys the account, which is the opposite of how most sizing errors behave.
So the practical version is a fraction of it: a quarter or a half. That keeps most of the growth and removes most of the catastrophe, and it is the only form of this rule worth putting near real money.
This is a sizing rule, not a trade. It sits on top of whatever entries you run, and its effect is on the shape of the equity curve rather than on whether any individual trade wins.
- Applies to
- Strategies with a long, stable record — not new ones
- Timeframe
- Any, but the estimate needs hundreds of trades
- The formula
- f = W − (1 − W) ÷ R, where W is the win rate and R the average win divided by the average loss
- Typical setting
- A quarter to a half of the computed f, capped by your fixed-fractional limit
- Tools
- Your own realised win rate and win/loss ratio, from a sample large enough to mean something
Valid setup
Exact rules
When it applies
- Compute f from realised results, never from a backtest's. The gap between the two is exactly the thing that makes full Kelly dangerous.
- Use a quarter of f to start. Half is defensible for a strategy with years of live record behind it.
- Cap the result at your fixed-fractional limit regardless of what the formula says. If Kelly suggests 8% per trade, the answer is not 8%, it is that your estimate is wrong.
- Recompute quarterly, on a rolling window. An edge that has decayed will show up here before it shows up in the equity curve.
The risk cap
- The stop is unchanged — Kelly sizes the position, it does not place the level.
- A negative f means the strategy has no edge at the sizes you are trading. The correct response is to stop, not to reduce.
- Never apply Kelly per trade to a portfolio of correlated positions. The formula assumes independent bets and correlated ones compound in the way it warns about.
Sizing and review
- Track the gap between computed f and what you are actually risking. That gap is your margin for being wrong about yourself.
- Full Kelly produces drawdowns that almost nobody can sit through — the theory is about growth rate, not comfort, and the two are not the same objective.
- If the computed f rises sharply after a good month, that is estimation noise, not a discovery. This is where the quarterly rolling window earns its place.
Build Fractional Kelly
Reading this page is free and always will be. Taking it is what costs — the complete MQL5 for the rules above, yours to keep, permanently. Five of them cost $10 and they never expire.
More from Risk & position sizing
Trading carries risk and most retail accounts lose money. Nothing on this page is financial advice or a recommendation to trade. The chart is an illustration of the rules on constructed candles — it is not a record of a trade and not a backtest.
